Reasonable legal doubt as excluding civil responsibility, enrichment without cause and other remedies against civil illicit comments from a STJ court

Main Article Content

Carlos E. Elias OLIVEIRA

Abstract

The article assesses case REsp 1617636. It holds that reasonable legal doubt is capable repelling or, at least, mitigating torts and civil liability, claims of unjust enrichment and other legal remedies. The article also brings precedents in the same holding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
OLIVEIRA, Carlos E. Elias. Reasonable legal doubt as excluding civil responsibility, enrichment without cause and other remedies against civil illicit: comments from a STJ court. Revista IBERC, Belo Horizonte, v. 3, n. 1, 2020. DOI: 10.37963/iberc.v3i1.102. Disponível em: https://revista.iberc.org.br/iberc/article/view/102. Acesso em: 24 aug. 2026.
Section
Comments to Jurisprudence
Author Biography

Carlos E. Elias OLIVEIRA, Universidade de Brasília

Professor de Direito Civil, Notarial e de Registros Públicos da Universidade de Brasília (UnB), no IDP/DF, Fundação do MPDFT, no EBD-SP, na Atame do DF e de GO e em outras instituições. Consultor Legislativo do Senado Federal em Direito Civil, Advogado, Parecerista, ex-Advogado da União e ex-assessor de ministro STJ. Doutorando, mestre e bacharel em Direito (UnB). Membro fundador do Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Contratual – IBDCont. Membro do Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos de Responsabilidade Civil – IBERC.